Book a consultation
How We Work

Analytics as a service: a fractional data team embedded in your company

Analytics as a service from Hurtado Analytics gives you a fractional data team that owns your reporting, data pipelines and decision support for a predictable monthly scope.

See how we work
Five disconnected spreadsheets become one managed model feeding leadership dashboardsBefore and after: scattered files on the left, one data model run by a fractional team feeding CEO, CFO and COO views on the right.Before: five disconnected filesAfter: one managed modelSales.xlsxFinance close.xlsxOps tracker.xlsxPipeline export.csvBudget v3.xlsxOne teamruns itManaged data modelCEO viewCFO viewCOO viewFive disconnected spreadsheets become one managed model feeding leadership dashboardsBefore and after: scattered files on the left, one data model run by a fractional team feeding CEO, CFO and COO views on the right.Before: five disconnected filesSales.xlsxFinance close.xlsxOps tracker.xlsxPipeline export.csvBudget v3.xlsxOne team runs itManaged data modelAfter: one managed modelCEO viewCFO viewCOO view

A growing company often needs more data work than one analyst can cover, but not enough to justify a full department. Our analytics as a service model closes that gap. A fractional data team works inside your tools, joins your management rhythm and delivers against an agreed monthly plan.

The team covers dashboards, data integration, data governance and the analysis behind leadership decisions. You keep ownership of everything we build, and scope flexes as priorities change.

The service usually follows advisory work or a readiness assessment. We propose a monthly plan only once priorities are clear and your organization is ready to work with an external team.

What it is

Analytics as a service is a managed team, not a software subscription

Analytics as a service is a delivery model in which an external team runs part or all of a company's analytics function on an ongoing basis. Many sources use the term, often shortened to AaaS, for cloud analytics software with its own deployment models. We use it for something different: a managed team of people who design, build and maintain your reporting and data foundations.

In practice, analytics as a service combines capabilities that are usually bought separately. BI as a service and data visualization as a service cover dashboards. Data integration as a service and data warehouse as a service cover pipelines. Data governance as a service covers definitions, quality and access.

The difference from a one-off project is continuity. The same people learn your business, keep metrics consistent from month to month and respond when leadership asks a new question. The difference from a hire is breadth. You draw on analyst, engineer and strategist skills without recruiting for each role.

The result is outsourced data analytics with the accountability of an internal team and the flexibility of a service.

How we work

A monthly cycle keeps managed analytics services tied to your priorities

The cycle starts only after advisory work has confirmed priorities and a fit and readiness check shows the service will be adopted. From then on, our managed analytics services run on a monthly cycle that keeps work visible and tied to business priorities. Leadership sets the agenda, the team delivers inside your own tools, and every cycle ends with a short review of what changed. Nothing is built without a decision it supports, and nothing is left unmaintained after release.

One monthly cycle of managed analytics services

Select a stage, use Next or the arrow keys

Prioritize. Work follows business value. Each month starts with leadership ranking reports, fixes and analysis requests by the decisions they support.

Step 1 of 4
Types

Choose the level of support: fractional data analyst, data team or CDO

Analytics as a service scales to the level of support you need. A company with one reporting gap needs different help from one rebuilding its data foundations. A common starting point is one model, moving up or down as needs change. Think of the three as deployment models for one service. The models share the same methods, so switching does not mean starting again.

Reports maintained and questions answered

A fractional data analyst keeps dashboards current and prepares recurring management reporting, part time.

Part-time support for a company with one clear reporting gap.

  • Keeps dashboards current
  • Prepares recurring management reporting
  • Answers ad hoc questions from leadership
Comparison

For steady, varied demand, analytics as a service beats hiring or one-off projects

Each route can work. The right choice depends on how much ongoing demand you have, how fast you need results and how much risk you can carry in a single hire. It also depends on how specialized the work is. Data engineering, BI development and governance rarely sit in one person.

Analytics as a service fits steady, varied demand; projects and hires fit the extremesPositioning chart: demand volume against variety of work, with one-off projects bottom left, in-house teams at high volume and analytics as a service in between.Ongoing demand volumeLowHighVariety of workVariedNarrowOne-off projectOne defined build,such as a migrationAnalytics as a serviceSteady, varied demandReporting, new questions andupkeep without a departmentIn-house teamLarge, stable demandthat keeps a fullteam busyAnalytics as a service fits steady, varied demand; projects and hires fit the extremesPositioning chart: demand volume against variety of work, with one-off projects bottom left, in-house teams at high volume and analytics as a service in between.Which model fits your demandOngoing demand volume: low to highOne-off projectOne defined build, such as a migrationVolume and varietyLow volume, narrow workAnalytics as a serviceSteady, varied demandReporting, new questions and upkeep withouta departmentVolume and varietySteady volume, varied workIn-house teamLarge, stable demand that keeps a full teambusyVolume and varietyHigh volume
ServiceIn-houseProject
How the engagement startsadvisory on your decisions, data and team, then a scoped monthly plana role definition and a recruiting processa defined scope and a fixed-fee proposal
Fit check before implementationwe confirm that we can genuinely help and that your team is readydepends on the hiring managervaries by provider, often limited to scoping
When implementation is offeredonce priorities are agreed and the organization is ready to adopt the workonce the hire is onboardedfrom signature, within the agreed scope
Cost structurepredictable monthly fee scaled to scopesalary, benefits, recruiting and toolingfixed fee for one defined deliverable
Speed to startshort, with an existing team and methodsmonths to recruit and onboardshort, limited to agreed scope
Skill coverageanalyst, engineering, BI and strategy in one planone or two skills per hireonly that project's skills
Continuity until adoptiona named team accountable through adoption, then ongoing improvementstrong while the person staysends at handover, knowledge leaves
Key-person riskspread across a documented teamhigh when knowledge sits with one personrises sharply after handover
Best fitsteady, varied demand without a full departmentlarge, stable demandone build, such as data modernization

Analytics as a service suits steady, varied demand: recurring reporting, regular new questions and foundations that need upkeep. Hiring in-house suits sustained demand large enough to keep a full team busy, plus time to recruit it. A fixed-scope outsourced data analytics project suits one defined build, such as a migration or a first set of dashboards.

The routes can be combined. One common sequence is advisory first, then a modernization project to build the foundations, then analytics as a service to run and extend them, with internal hires added once demand is clear. The table compares the three routes on cost, speed, coverage and risk, the factors leadership teams usually weigh. In short: buy a service for steady, varied work, hire for large and stable work, and run a project for one defined build. If demand is uncertain, start with advisory or a readiness assessment. Once priorities are clear, the service is the easiest route to scale up, scale down or convert into internal hires. The rows below set out the trade-offs.

How to read the comparison

Look first at the best-fit row, then at key-person risk. Cost alone is misleading. A single hire can look cheaper on paper, but the true cost includes recruiting time, the months before that person is productive and the risk that knowledge leaves with them. A project can look cheaper too, until the first change request arrives after handover.

Analytics as a service trades a predictable monthly fee for continuity and breadth of skills. For a mid-sized company without a full department, the service is designed to lower key-person risk while it builds a data function. It also keeps the option to hire later, with a documented stack and a team ready to hand over. Use the table as a starting point for that conversation with your leadership team.

Benefits

CEOs, CFOs and COOs get one version of the truth and faster answers

Analytics as a service is bought by the executives who depend on the numbers, not only by data or IT leads. Each role gets something specific from a fractional data team, and all of them get one shared version of the truth.

That matters most in leadership meetings. When finance, sales and operations bring figures from the same governed model, discussion moves from reconciling numbers to deciding what to do. Questions that would otherwise need days of spreadsheet work can be answered from the shared model, often before the next meeting. The outcomes below are the ones the service is designed to deliver.

New leadership questions answered in days, not weeksPaired bars, working days to a trusted answer, spreadsheet work vs shared model: CFO 9 vs 3, CEO 8 vs 2, RevOps 6 vs 1, COO 5 vs 1 (demo data).New leadership questions answered in days, not weeksDemo dataWorking days from a new question to a trusted answer, by roleSpreadsheet workShared governed modelCFOBoard pack variance question9 days3 daysCEONew strategic question8 days2 daysRevOpsPipeline vs bookings gap6 days1 dayCOOCapacity question5 days1 day0246810Answer ready before the next meetingWorking daysNew leadership questions answered in days, not weeksPaired bars, working days to a trusted answer, spreadsheet work vs shared model: CFO 9 vs 3, CEO 8 vs 2, RevOps 6 vs 1, COO 5 vs 1 (demo data).New leadership questionsanswered in days, not weeksDemo dataWorking days from a new question to a trustedanswerSpreadsheet workShared governed modelCFO: board pack variance9 days3 daysCEO: new strategic question8 days2 daysRevOps: pipeline vs bookings6 days1 dayCOO: capacity question5 days1 dayCEO answer ready before the next meeting

Each outcome below names the role, what changes for that role and the decision it supports. Each monthly cycle ends with defined outputs, so progress is visible from the first month. Each card is one example.

Strategic questions answered sooner

The CEO gets one view of performance and a team that answers new questions quickly, without adding permanent headcount or management overhead.

  • No added permanent headcount
  • Board packs from the same governed model

Internal analysts who grow

Your data staff gain extra capacity, specialist support and training, so they build skills instead of being replaced.

Board meetings spent on decisions

Board packs come from the same governed model as internal dashboards, so directors discuss actions instead of questioning figures.

What you get

Every month ends with defined outputs you can check

Every engagement includes a defined set of monthly outputs. We agree them at scoping and review them each cycle, so you always know what the service delivered and what comes next. Each output is written up in plain English, so leaders who never open a dashboard still know what changed and why it matters.

Every monthly deliverable is dated and checked at the reviewChecklist of six monthly outputs, each ticked with its delivery date, closed by a monthly review that confirms six of six delivered (demo data).October cycle: monthly deliverablesDemo dataBacklog agreed, delivery summary writtenOct 2Dashboards updated, refresh issues fixedOct 9Pipelines and quality checks maintainedOct 14Data dictionary updated for 3 KPIsOct 17Pricing analysis with plain-English summaryOct 23Data issues logged and closed: 7Oct 28Monthly review, Oct 30: 6 of 6 outputs deliveredEvery monthly deliverable is dated and checked at the reviewChecklist of six monthly outputs, each ticked with its delivery date, closed by a monthly review that confirms six of six delivered (demo data).October cycle: monthlydeliverablesDemo dataBacklog agreed, delivery summarywrittenOct 2Dashboards updated, refreshissues fixedOct 9Pipelines and quality checksmaintainedOct 14Data dictionary updated for 3KPIsOct 17Pricing analysis withplain-English summaryOct 23Data issues logged and closed: 7Oct 28Monthly review, Oct 30: 6 of 6outputs delivered
  • A clear plan and a written summary

    A prioritized backlog at the start, a delivery summary and review session at the end.

  • Dashboards people can rely on

    New and updated dashboards, with refresh issues tracked and fixed as soon as they are detected.

  • Pipelines that keep running

    Integrations, warehouse tables and data quality checks maintained across your source systems.

  • One meaning for every KPI

    A maintained data dictionary that every team and report uses.

  • Decisions backed by analysis

    Ad hoc analysis for pricing, hiring, budgeting or expansion, with a plain-English summary.

  • Data issues logged and closed

    A running log of data quality issues, their cause and the fix, so recurring problems are solved at the source.

Use cases

Analytics as a service supports every function that runs on recurring reports

Analytics as a service supports any function that relies on recurring reporting and analysis. These are common areas for a fractional data team.

Finance closes and reports faster

Management accounts, cash and profitability reporting built from your ERP, with reconciliation built in so finance trusts every figure.

Sales sees one pipeline

Pipeline, conversion, retention and forecast reporting that reconciles CRM and billing data into one view for sales leadership.

Operations finds bottlenecks early

Capacity, delivery and service-level dashboards replace spreadsheet trackers and show where work is slowing down each week.

Marketing links spend to pipeline

GA4 and CRM reporting with consistent attribution rules, so budget decisions rest on the same numbers as sales.

Leadership plans from evidence

Executive dashboards and quarterly planning support, with a fractional CDO available for strategic questions and board preparation.

HR and people analytics

Headcount, hiring, attrition and cost reporting from HR and payroll systems, linked to finance for workforce planning.

A common starting point is one function, such as finance or sales, extending to others once the shared data model is in place. Each new use case reuses the same integrated data and definitions, so it costs less to add than the one before. That is how a small monthly plan grows into a company-wide analytics function without a large up-front investment.

Each use case below names the team, the outcome and the data behind it. They are examples, not a fixed menu. If a function in your company depends on recurring numbers, it can be covered by the same service and the same model.

Pricing

You pay a fixed monthly fee for an agreed scope, not for hours

Pricing is based on scope, not on hours logged. During scoping we estimate the monthly capacity your priorities require, then agree a fixed monthly fee for that level of service. You know the cost in advance, and there are no surprise invoices for extra hours.

Three factors drive scope: the number of data sources and systems involved, the volume of recurring reporting and maintenance, and how much strategic support you need from a fractional CDO or head of data. A company with a few systems and a defined report set needs a lighter plan than one running several entities, currencies and platforms. We share the scope assumptions in writing, so you can see exactly what the monthly fee covers.

Three scope drivers set one fixed monthly feeData sources, reporting volume and strategic support each set a scope level, and together they define one fixed monthly plan.Data sourcesSystems and integrationsscope levelReporting volumeRecurring reports and upkeepscope levelStrategic supportFractional CDO timescope levelOne fixed monthly planAgreed at scopingReviewed as priorities changeNo invoices for extra hoursThree scope drivers set one fixed monthly feeData sources, reporting volume and strategic support each set a scope level, and together they define one fixed monthly plan.Three scope drivers, one monthly feeData sourcesSystems and integrationsscope levelReporting volumeRecurring reports and upkeepscope levelStrategic supportFractional CDO timescope levelOne fixed monthly planAgreed at scopingReviewed as priorities changeNo invoices for extra hours

Engagements can start small and grow. Capacity is reviewed at agreed points and can be adjusted up or down as priorities change. If you are not sure where to start, an AI and data readiness assessment gives you a baseline and a recommended service level before you commit to a monthly plan.

Common challenges

The usual concerns about an external data team have clear answers

Leaders considering an external data team usually raise the same five questions. Each one has a practical answer built into how we work. The concerns center on business knowledge, control of data, internal skills, flexibility and retained knowledge, and each is addressed in how the engagement is set up from the first week.

  1. 1

    An external team that knows your business

    Structured onboarding on your model, systems and KPIs, and we aim to keep the same people on the account.

  2. 2

    Your data stays under your control

    We work inside your environment and access controls. You own everything we build.

  3. 3

    Internal staff gain skills

    We work alongside your team and can add training.

  4. 4

    Scope that changes with you

    Capacity is reviewed regularly and adjusts up or down.

  5. 5

    Knowledge stays with you

    Every model, pipeline and definition is documented, so nothing depends on one person, inside or outside your company.

Frequently asked questions

Analytics as a service: questions buyers ask before handing over reporting

The basics3

Not in our case. Many providers use the term for cloud software. Our analytics as a service is a managed team of people who build and run your reporting, data pipelines and governance using the tools you already have or the ones we recommend together.

Outsourced BI usually means a vendor builds dashboards to a specification. A fractional data team takes ongoing ownership: it maintains pipelines and definitions, answers new questions and joins your planning rhythm, so the work keeps pace with the business instead of ending at handover.

We work inside your environment, under your access controls and policies. Access is role-based and reviewed at agreed points, credentials stay in your systems, and data is not copied to our own infrastructure unless you approve it. Every pipeline and permission is documented, so your IT or security team can audit the service at any time.

Scope, cost and working with us2

Yes, once a short advisory review has confirmed the priorities. The service can then begin with part-time analyst capacity focused on a few critical reports. As the value becomes clear, you can add data engineering or a fractional chief data officer without recruiting, because the service is designed to scale within the same team.

No. We usually complement internal staff by covering skills they lack, such as data engineering or governance, and by taking on maintenance work. Where useful, we also train your team so it can take over more of the work over time.

One call shows whether analytics as a service fits your team

Tell us which decisions depend on data today and where reporting falls short. In one call we outline the right engagement model, the first month's priorities and how analytics as a service would fit alongside your current team and tools. You leave with a clear next step, whether that is a readiness assessment, a defined project or a monthly plan, and no obligation to continue. If a monthly plan would be premature, we say so and recommend advisory or training first.

See how we work
Next-step finder

Which next step fits your team?

3 questions. We suggest one next step. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Illustrative
1. What do you need most right now?
2. How steady is your demand for data work?
3. Where does your team need to grow most?
0 of 3 answered